A day in Arles: Avignon Day 2 (12 Sep 2013)

How many towns do you visit that have gone from being capitals or major ports in their region to being small villages or minor towns? A surprising number it seems to us, which is just another reminder that towns, like people, should enjoy their day in the sun while they can, because it rarely lasts! Of course, towns, unlike people, can, with care, become more beautiful with age or, at least, can be more easily, albeit expensively, preserved!

Avignon is such a town, as is the nearby Arles. One reason for coming to Avignon was to visit Arles … and so this is what we did on Day 2.

There are two main reasons for going to Arles, besides just wandering about and soaking up the atmosphere, and they are:

1. Roman (and mediaeval) history trail

Arles has some significant Roman ruins, of which the main ones are the Roman amphitheatre, the Roman theatre and the Baths of Constantine. We bought a €9 day ticket which covered these and a few other sights. Pretty good value, except that many of the ruins are in poor shape and there’s minimal signage or interpretation (in either French or English) in most. Many of the buildings have suffered immensely over the years, often being modified for different uses as regimes have come and gone, but it’s great to see them being both used now and cared for as historic monuments. Let’s hope they get the use-preservation balance right!

We visited:

  • Roman amphitheatre: a two-tiered amphitheatre built during the 1st or 2nd century BC. It is used to today for various events including bullfights, plays and other performances, and is the most popular Roman “ruin” in Arles. We climbed a tower for a view of the surrounding countryside. As we’ve said before, who needs gyms! At one stage in its life, it was converted into houses with a public square, but in the 19th century the French writer Merimée pushed for its recognition as a national monument.
  • Roman theatre: built from around 40/30 to 12 BC during the reign of Emperor Augustus. Much of it has been destroyed, with very few columns that defined the stage remaining. The grounds were filled with carved capitals and other stonework. But there’s a good audiovisual display describing its history and use. It is currently used for outdoor performances.
  • Cryptoportiques: underground tunnels, built around the 1st century BC as foundation for the forum. The forum no longer exists, so we entered these through the Hotel de Ville (or Town Hall). Again, lacking signage, all we can tell you is what Wikipedia says which is that masons’ marks suggest these ones were built by Greeks. Similar structures elsewhere were used as granaries, Wikipedia continues, but the one at Arles is too damp for prolonged storage and may have been used as a barracks for public slaves. It was certainly damp when we were there; we had to watch for puddles underfoot in certain areas. Interesting but more information would have been great.
  • Church and cloister of St Trophime: the cloisters are currently undergoing major restoration with areas closed off, but we were able to peek in and see a bunch of conservators at their painstaking work. The cloisters were built in the second half of the 12th century in Romanesque style and the first half of the 13th century in Gothic style. There’s a wonderful tapestry hall, and some interesting sculptures – of course – including one of St Trophime who was apparently the first bishop of Arles around 250AD and a well-regarded one of St Paul.
  • Baths of Constantine: built in the early 14th century when Emperor Constantine lived in the area. They are apparently among the best preserved in France. They were swarming with students sketching them, but there was almost no signage, in any language, describing the different parts.

2. Van Gogh trail

While there are no Van Gogh works or museums in Arles, this is where he (in)famously severed his ear, and, more importantly, where he painted many of his significant works, including Starry Night on the Rhône, The Night Cafe, The Yellow Bedroom, L’Arlisienne. He was in Arles from February 1888 to May 1889, leaving when the Arlisiennes became increasingly bothered by his drinking and erratic behaviour.

You can visit – gratis – L’Espace Van Gogh, which contains the garden, within the hospital grounds, that he painted. The garden is maintained much as it was when he was there so you can compare it with one of the paintings (displayed on a plaque).

But, we wanted more! And noted on our map that you could see the Langlois bridge he painted (more than once as it turns out), so off we trotted. Well, over 2.5kms later down a dusty road by the canal and having twice being told, about a kilometre apart, that there was a kilometre to go, we found it. And, while there was almost no directional signage to it, other than a couple of rough hand-painted ones, when we arrived, there was a plaque like the one in the garden, containing a copy of the original painting and some minimal details about the work. We were tired, but it was worth it – sort of, as we discovered that the bridge is a reconstruction of the original! Fortunately, it wasn’t overly hot and the walking was flat. Poor Arles. It’s hard to make a buck out of Van Gogh when you have so little!

Back in town en route to Constantine’s Baths, we came across another Van Gogh plaque at the bottom of a large bridge over the Rhône, but the bridge has changed a little since then and didn’t have the same allure as OUR bridge!

Refreshments

As we walked between sights, we came across a little patisserie or boulangerie selling warm out-of-the oven fresh-fig topped soft cakey-bread. After trying the free taste we had to buy to share a rather large slice for the very reasonable sum of €1.50. It was hard not to buy a second round but wheat-challenges, not to mention calories, made us see sense!

We had thought of finding a nice place for a leisurely lunch in Arles but in the end, with so much to see, we settled on a tasty lentil soup and fresh sandwich at a lovely little cafe, Le Monde de Sophie, in a side street. It was a great little find and kept us going for the rest of the day (though Len may or may not have bought an icecream in the afternoon!).

That night we ate at our second Pascal recommended restaurant, another small, seemingly family owned one called Le Chat Touilleurs. It was fine but our least favourite of the four of his recommendations that we tried. Sue did, though, enjoy her Chicken Brochettes with Honey Sauce, Fresh Fig and Rice. The chicken was a little dry, but it was tasty.

Three-words

SUE: Ruins, Conservation, Figs
LEN: Roman, Stone, Vincent

and the stills…

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

and the movies…

Walking in the Cryptoportiques, Arles

 

The Roman Amphitheatre, Arles

 

The Espace Von Gogh, Arles

 

10 thoughts on “A day in Arles: Avignon Day 2 (12 Sep 2013)”

  1. I never know to be wary of hoteliers’ recommendations or not. Sometimes, they have a deal stitched up with restaurateurs so they’re not really independent, and sometimes they really do send you off to the best places in town. It’s like Trip Advisor, where The Eye of the Beholder is not always as useful as it seems at first.
    I do like the sound of Arles, despite its limitations LOL. (Aren’t the French exasperating with signage! A classic case of, if this matters to you, you’re not from here, and if you’re not from here, you don’t matter.)
    One day, one day, I’m going to do an ‘art lovers’ tour of France (not an organised trip, I’d rather travel independently in France) and I have just added Arles to the as-yet-merely-aspirational itinerary.

    • Oh yes, Lisa, I know what you mean about hoteliers. You never follow blindly, but do what you can to suss out. Look at the place itself, the menu, who seems to be there. Sometimes you just have to trust because there’s not a lot if other info. Our Avignon hotelier did seem ok from other signs and as it turned out we really liked three of his four recommendations. Trip adviser is similar though you have multiple reviews to compare … I have started doing reviews there. The more context people give to their reviews the better of course. Are they adventurous eaters? Do they do in Rome? Etc?

      As for signage, it certainly was a challenge in Arles. But at the Palais des Papes … Next post … The audio guide was great and they had lots of videos in French with English subtitles. Excellent. When were you there?

      We’d generally rather travel independently too. Intrepid in Spain/Portugal was an experiment. Our leader was great and we learnt a lot. You can be independent quite a bit with their tours eg in several places some went shopping or in Lagos, to the beach, while we went to more cathedrals etc! Main issue is we like to stay longer in places.

  2. 1. Cryptoportiques is my new favourite word.
    2. ROMAN RUINS YES!!
    3. I splurged on figs today and they were so exquisite I almost couldn’t breathe and now I see that the reason my mind whispered “buy them” is because you were eating them too. x

    • Or cryptoporticus, the English word!

      That fig “cake” was to die for and I’m not a huge fig fan. I don’t dislike them but have never really seen what all the fuss was about. But this … Yum, Hannah!

  3. Oh WOW. I haven’t travelled to Southern France yet, but warm, fresh fig cake may well tip the balance to getting me there. It looks sensational, and must have been good to tempt the non-wheat eaters. I hadn’t realised that Arles was so close to Avignon, how wonderful to go to both.

    • Oh yes, Louise, the cake was really something. So far the non-wheat eater is surviving on eating some wheat. It’s pretty easy to avoid all the other no-nos, so by being careful overall, I can relax the wheat a bit and so far the eczema is holding out. We shared the slice too, but oh dear, we could have eaten two slices each given half the chance! This was our first time in southern France and it was wonderful, Louise.

Comments are closed.